Note from abraham Weizfeld PhD to the Arizona Rebellion

Page by Red-Black Wave

The dismantling of the Anarcho Syndical Family was a major loss for Anarchists. We in the Arizona Rebellion had hoped to pass to abraham Weizfeld PhD the foundation of the Anarcho Syndical Family. The Arizona Rebellion is a new Anarchist formation, one of the pillars of our Anarchist development in theoretical advancement is the written template of the Anarcho Syndical Family. Dr. Weizfeld has the title within the Jewish Bundist Diaspora Movement as the Chairman of the Revolution he has now read the Syndical Commune Family Rules and he has now replied to them. We really wanted Comrade Net to send this to him and it seems that he finally did. So it is good that abraham Weizfeld PhD has replied to us. This is very good for us, because Dr. Weizfeld has a reputation of showing solidarity to real Anarchists.

THE REPLY BY DR. WEIZFELD
 This set of principles in Anarchist thought is interesting and compelling. The Panther theorist Newton used a term which corresponds to the first Anarchist revolution in Paris 1870 when the Paris Commune was operating for 3 months before being crushed by the Royalist troops in collaboration with the Prussian-German State occupation. That term is communalism. The distinction with Communism is that there is no State, which is the fatal flaw of Communism.

 Re Constitution #4  Where it is stated, "Christian Anarchism and Jewish Anarchism are ... ideologies of false consciousness. Anyone maintaining Jewishness should be expelled and encouraged to further the causes of restoring the Jewish Bund" the fundamental error of equating Christianity and Jewishness since the Jewish political culture is more than a religious sect. We are a People-Nation with a history of Judaism as a philosophy and an inter-national social structure. We exist as a minority nationality, 'A Nation within a Nation'. For us to be a Bundist and an Anarchist is no contradiction.

 #5. Murray Bookchin had a personal character that contradicted Anarchist rejection of imposed authority. At the conclusion of a meeting of the Black Rose collective here in Montréal where i reported on my planned voyage to Libya, Bookchin pointed to me a ordered me not to go there to meet Kadhafi. I was shocked and more so when I heard that Bookshin was pro-Zionist. Some Anarchist tendencies keep up their acquiescence to the Zionist State until as late as 1982.

  #7 The difference between the Trotskyists and Troskyism is that the latter actually knows what the Permanent Revolution is. This theory does not originate with Trotsky/Bronstein but is more so an Anarchist theory discussed in various ways previously by writers including Marx. Permanent Revolution taken to its logical conclusion rejects the State as a dominating superstructure over Civil Society, as well as never-ending revolutionary innovation.

 #8. 'Dialectical and Historical Materialism' was formulated during the period of classical science when causality was the methodology built upon Hegelianism. This introduced a formal logic into Historical Materialism which assumed a historical linear-periodisation of continual progress along similar lines in every social development from Capitalism to Socialism. However history does not necessarily progress as Rosa Luxemburg pointed out the danger of regression to "Barbarism" which should actually be called Fascism. In addition other Third-World countries may just skip Capitalism to become Socialist. This Permanent Revolution contradicts the formalism in Historical Materialism.

  #9. 'Direct Democracy' was the motto of the Jamahiriyia in Libya following the Green Book but it too failed due to the lack of a Constitutional Assembly that was promised by Kadhafi in 1972 but was never formed to write the new Constitution for its Civil Society.

 #10. "Our own Militias must stand in waiting to protect our Communities" is an existential necessity.

 For the United Front of revolutionary socialist forces to oppose the counter-revolutionary reaction to the ongoing revolutionary process. Despite any disagreements there is a fundamental collective interest that fascism must fail this time. For this reason we need the United Front with the Sanders socialist campaign but with critical support. As for personally voting itself, that is largely irrelevant.

 People in the USA are facing a great challenge and its oppositions' efforts will weigh heavily in the determination for the coming epoch.